<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second Order Effects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infovore.org/archives/2009/01/15/second-order-effects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infovore.org/archives/2009/01/15/second-order-effects/</link>
	<description>a weblog by Tom Armitage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 09:50:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana Neves</title>
		<link>http://infovore.org/archives/2009/01/15/second-order-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-134349</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana Neves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infovore.org/?p=2213#comment-134349</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, Tom. It reminded me of a post I wrote on Headshift&#039;s blog, some time ago: http://www.headshift.com/blog/2007/01/news-papers.php

The tone of my post is different and if, anything, it points towards going &quot;online&quot;. Despite the reasons I state on the post, there are the &quot;save-a-tree&quot; aspects, and all that jazz.

Having said that, I have to secretly admit (you won&#039;t tell anyone, will you?), that I like to read printed papers. I like the touch of the paper (maybe not so much the ink on your hands, but...) and the rustle of the pages. I like the serendipitous nature of reading a newspaper, as Nina said before me. And, as I mention on my post, I love newspapers as conversation-starters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, Tom. It reminded me of a post I wrote on Headshift&#8217;s blog, some time ago: <a href="http://www.headshift.com/blog/2007/01/news-papers.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.headshift.com/blog/2007/01/news-papers.php</a></p>
<p>The tone of my post is different and if, anything, it points towards going &#8220;online&#8221;. Despite the reasons I state on the post, there are the &#8220;save-a-tree&#8221; aspects, and all that jazz.</p>
<p>Having said that, I have to secretly admit (you won&#8217;t tell anyone, will you?), that I like to read printed papers. I like the touch of the paper (maybe not so much the ink on your hands, but&#8230;) and the rustle of the pages. I like the serendipitous nature of reading a newspaper, as Nina said before me. And, as I mention on my post, I love newspapers as conversation-starters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nina</title>
		<link>http://infovore.org/archives/2009/01/15/second-order-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-133775</link>
		<dc:creator>Nina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infovore.org/?p=2213#comment-133775</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it&#039;s just me but when I open a newspaper I usually find a story that I never thought would have interested me on a topic like health or sport that I would never seek out. I don&#039;t usually accidentally find those stories online, I don&#039;t start reading them by accident because I don&#039;t click through to them and that&#039;s the value of print media for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s just me but when I open a newspaper I usually find a story that I never thought would have interested me on a topic like health or sport that I would never seek out. I don&#8217;t usually accidentally find those stories online, I don&#8217;t start reading them by accident because I don&#8217;t click through to them and that&#8217;s the value of print media for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

