<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tim Bray on user-generated-content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infovore.org/archives/2006/07/27/tim-bray-on-user-generated-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infovore.org/archives/2006/07/27/tim-bray-on-user-generated-content/</link>
	<description>a weblog by Tom Armitage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:42:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://infovore.org/archives/2006/07/27/tim-bray-on-user-generated-content/comment-page-1/#comment-6279</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infovore.org/archives/2006/07/27/tim-bray-on-user-generated-content/#comment-6279</guid>
		<description>As someone who&#039;s usually had &#039;user&#039; somewhere in their job title or on the tip of my tongue for a decade or so, I&#039;v been wrestling with the &#039;us/them&#039;ness of it as a term for a while. 

Don Norman recently wrote: &quot;Words matter. Psychologists depersonalize the people they study by calling them â€œsubjects.â€? We depersonalize the people we study by calling them â€œusers.â€? Both terms are derogatory. They take us away from our primary mission: to help people. Power to the people, I say, to repurpose an old phrase. People. Human Beings. Thatâ€™s what our discipline is really about.&quot;

http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/words_matter_talk_ab.html

People is a bit fluffy/hippy/huggy to convince the grownups you know whatyou&#039;re doing I reckon though, I&#039;m leaning towards pinching a term from the economists and lawyers, specifically Yochai Benkler (http://www.benkler.org/) who is famous for using the term &#039;Peer-production&#039;

Is there mileage in &#039;peer-generated content&#039;, or &#039;peer-centred design&#039;?

hmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who&#8217;s usually had &#8216;user&#8217; somewhere in their job title or on the tip of my tongue for a decade or so, I&#8217;v been wrestling with the &#8216;us/them&#8217;ness of it as a term for a while. </p>
<p>Don Norman recently wrote: &#8220;Words matter. Psychologists depersonalize the people they study by calling them â€œsubjects.â€? We depersonalize the people we study by calling them â€œusers.â€? Both terms are derogatory. They take us away from our primary mission: to help people. Power to the people, I say, to repurpose an old phrase. People. Human Beings. Thatâ€™s what our discipline is really about.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/words_matter_talk_ab.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/words_matter_talk_ab.html</a></p>
<p>People is a bit fluffy/hippy/huggy to convince the grownups you know whatyou&#8217;re doing I reckon though, I&#8217;m leaning towards pinching a term from the economists and lawyers, specifically Yochai Benkler (<a href="http://www.benkler.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.benkler.org/</a>) who is famous for using the term &#8216;Peer-production&#8217;</p>
<p>Is there mileage in &#8216;peer-generated content&#8217;, or &#8216;peer-centred design&#8217;?</p>
<p>hmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

